We help organisations understand and improve their performance through harnessing feedback, especially from the people they serve. We have developed Constituent Voice™ for this purpose.
Light touch continuous feedback
Our consultants will help you build a system that saves time and money while amplifying your learning.
The Feedback Commons provides you with the means to combine new and old data sets, and combine listening across channels into a common analysis.
Benchmarks and predictive Indicators
Test your theory of change through feedback loops with each of your most important constituent groups. Reliable data becomes insight through dialogues with constituents.
The recipe for our secret sauce
Organizations can ask the people who are intended to benefit from social change what they think about plans, performance and reports. We call this Constituent Voice.
Constituent Voice is a tool to manage performance rather than a form of evaluation, and used in all our surveys. Still, feedback data is an early indicator of change taking place and can be triangulated with other evidence of results (including objective measures and impact evaluations) to enrich your understanding of what is happening now.
It is often predictive of future outcomes. In developing the Constituent Voice method, Keystone has drawn from tested customer satisfaction techniques, and has adapted them to the context of development where people’s choice is often limited by the monopolistic position of aid agencies and government service providers.
Ask 2 to 5 questions continuously across a representative sample of your constituents.
Cluster responses by promoters, passives and detractors.
Analyse and compare your feedback with that of similar organisations.
Act on feedback and dialogue to increase promoters and decrease detractors.
Where you can gain a deeper understanding of our methods and our work
Out of the blue, we sent you, our clients, partners and friends, a short survey that asked what you think about us. Here’s what you told us. Firstly, you told us that an out of the blue survey is not the right way to do this. Ninety-two of you responded, for an overall response rate of eight percent. For those of you in current engagements with us the response rate was 12 percent. Our reigning[…]
US nonprofit LIFT, which works to end intergenerational poverty, has been using client feedback to test its theory of change. LIFT works with low income families in Chicago, Los Angeles, New York and Washington, D.C. Parents (who LIFT call members) are paired with volunteer advocates and they work together to achieve the member’s goals. These could be finding affordable housing, decent education or building confidence and skills to manage tough times. LIFT has been using[…]
At Keystone, we are very quick to make the argument that listening to those you aim to serve is not only the right thing to do, but also the bright thing – a way to not only better understand impact, but more importantly as a way to improve impact.
Some problems do not get solved because the human side of the issue is not at the center of the debate. Using the storytelling process can be a solution.
Keystone Accountability has found that data often falls into one of two categories; either it tells you something you had no idea about, or it confirms what you already suspected.
Surveys are a double-edged sword. It is useful, irresistibly so, to be able to assert something that is supported by survey results. Most of us are enthralled by this sirens’ call – I certainly am! But at the same time, surveys are riddled with two kinds of distortions. These have various technical names but boil down to two simple things – accuracy and representativeness. First, in surveys we tend not to give “honest” responses. It[…]
I have a confession to make. Despite two years of surveying thousands of respondents for our clients I still fire up Google in the hopes that it will one day tell me how to conduct surveys the right way. Now, this is mainly due to being overly ambitious: I would one day love to see a 100 percent response rate or a completely full raw dataset. In the meantime though, I’ll settle for actionable insights[…]
We would all like our work to speak for itself, better still if someone else can vouch for us! One way that industries like to do this is to showcase their ratings and feedback from customers. Not only does this help improve their service, but also help build credibility and trust. In the development context, this has taken more centre-stage. Findings from a UKAID funded pilot programme in seven locations around the world, demonstrated the[…]
No longer can anyone use the excuse that it’s “too hard” or “too expensive” to refrain from collecting the kind of feedback that you will actually use to improve performance. We built the Feedback Commons to provide a platform that any organization could use to collect, analyze, and respond to feedback from the people they work with at low cost, and with minimal effort. It’s free and simple. Anyone can design a survey – using questions[…]
Nonprofit organizations and foundations love to talk about “partnering”, “co-creating”, leverage”, and “synergy” – but do these hook-ups really yield as much value for the effort involved? Or is it just beneficial to be seen collaborating? I searched for reports on what value non-profit professionals typically get out of collaborations, but sadly, there doesn’t seem to be much research on this. One exception is Keystone’s own Partnership Survey. We measure this along dimensions of the[…]